MolDraw › Chemistry tools › 13C NMR Predictor

13C NMR Predictor

In short: Draw a molecule or paste its SMILES. You get a predicted ¹³C shift for every numbered carbon, DEPT-90/135 multiplicities, symmetry-equivalent carbons merged into one signal, and a stick spectrum. It runs in your browser with no sign-up.

The shifts come from textbook additive increments, and each value shows the terms it was built from. They are predictions, not measured data. On our test set of 15 molecules the mean absolute error is 1.3 ppm; see accuracy.

Quick answer: ethyl acetate, CCOC(C)=O, gives 4 signals. Predicted here: C=O 171.0 (quaternary, absent in DEPT), O–CH₂ 60.8 (negative in DEPT-135), CH₃–C=O 17.8 and the ethyl CH₃ 13.6 ppm (both positive in DEPT-135). Measured in CDCl₃: 171.4, 60.5, 21.0 and 14.2 ppm.

Loading editor…

Open in MolDraw

Examples:

Loading the chemistry engine…

How to use the 13C NMR predictor

  1. Draw the molecule, or paste a SMILES string and press Enter. Pick an example to try it.
  2. Each carbon gets a red number on the drawing. The table and the spectrum use the same numbers.
  3. Carbons that are equivalent by symmetry are merged into one signal (for example the two ortho carbons of toluene).
  4. Read the multiplicity: CH₃, CH₂, CH or C (quaternary). DEPT-90 shows only CH. DEPT-135 shows CH and CH₃ up and CH₂ down. Quaternary carbons disappear in both.
  5. Open "terms" in any row to see how the value was built. Copy the list, or download CSV or the spectrum as SVG.

How the shifts are estimated

Every carbon starts from a base value for its type. Then the effect of each nearby atom or group is added. These additive increments are the classic textbook method for estimating ¹³C shifts by hand.

Sources: E. Pretsch, P. Bühlmann, M. Badertscher, Structure Determination of Organic Compounds, 4th ed. (Springer, 2009); D. M. Grant & E. G. Paul, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2984; D. F. Ewing, Org. Magn. Reson. 1979, 12, 499; R. M. Silverstein, F. X. Webster, D. J. Kiemle & D. L. Bryce, Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 8th ed. (Wiley, 2014).

Accuracy: measured against experimental spectra

We compared the predictions with experimental ¹³C shifts in CDCl₃ for 15 common molecules. Values for ethanol, acetone, toluene, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, pyridine and acetonitrile are from Fulmer et al. (2010). The others are literature values (SDBS, AIST, and standard texts), rounded to 0.1 ppm. This table is computed live in your browser from the same code that makes the predictions.

1.3 ppmmean absolute error, 15 test molecules (83 carbons)
2.0 ppmmean absolute error, 17 further molecules (46 carbons) not used to set any increment

Loading the validation table…

Read these numbers with care. The benzene increments were first derived from monosubstituted benzenes such as toluene, anisole, benzaldehyde and nitrobenzene, so their near-zero error flatters the method. We also checked the test molecules while writing the code. The second set (methanol, ethers, THF, DMF, triethylamine, alkanes, nitromethane and others, all from Fulmer et al. 2010) is a fairer guide: about 2 ppm on average. Expect 2–5 ppm for typical drug-like molecules and 5–10 ppm or more for some carbons in heterocycles (caffeine C4 and C5 are off by about 10 ppm), crowded rings and molecules with several heteroatoms on one carbon. Database (HOSE-code) and machine-learning predictors usually reach about 1.5–2.5 ppm.

G. R. Fulmer, A. J. M. Miller, N. H. Sherden, H. E. Gottlieb, A. Nudelman, B. M. Stoltz, J. E. Bercaw, K. I. Goldberg, Organometallics 2010, 29, 2176–2179. SDBS: Spectral Database for Organic Compounds, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan.

What this tool does not do

For a database-based prediction that also gives ¹H spectra, try Structure to NMR. To look up typical ranges, use the NMR chemical shift table.

Frequently asked questions

How accurate is this 13C NMR predictor?

On 15 test molecules (83 carbons, experimental CDCl₃ data) the mean absolute error is about 1.3 ppm, and about 2.0 ppm on a second set of 17 solvents and small molecules. Single carbons in heterocycles such as caffeine can be off by about 10 ppm.

How does the predictor estimate 13C shifts?

It adds textbook substituent increments to a base value for each carbon type: the Grant–Paul and Pretsch scheme for sp³ carbons, benzene ring increments for aromatic carbons, alkene increments for C=C, and base values with corrections for carbonyl, nitrile and alkyne carbons.

What do DEPT-90 and DEPT-135 show?

DEPT-90 shows only CH carbons. DEPT-135 shows CH and CH₃ carbons as positive peaks and CH₂ carbons as negative peaks. Quaternary carbons, including most C=O carbons, are missing from both.

Why does my molecule have fewer signals than carbons?

Carbons that are equivalent by symmetry give one signal. Toluene has 7 carbons but 5 signals, because the two ortho and the two meta carbons are equivalent.

Is this the same as the Structure to NMR tool?

No. Structure to NMR sends the structure to an online model and also predicts ¹H spectra. This page runs a simple increment method in your browser, shows how each value was built, adds DEPT editing and works offline after loading.

Last updated: